" "
top of page

Burn the Boats: A Philosophy for Justice in Medical Malpractice Cases

  • Writer: EvaluCare
    EvaluCare
  • May 23
  • 6 min read

A "Burn the Boats"  philosophy for justice in medical malpractice cases is exactly what is needed to ensure patients and families get the justice they deserve.
A "Burn the Boats" philosophy for justice in medical malpractice cases is exactly what is needed to ensure patients and families get the justice they deserve.

In the realm of medical malpractice, the journey to justice can be daunting, especially when confronting large healthcare organizations. Yet, the ancient strategy of "burning the boats" offers a powerful metaphor for unwavering commitment. This philosophy, rooted in historical military tactics and echoed in modern literature, underscores the importance of eliminating retreat options to fully commit to a cause.


A burn the boats philosophy is easier when you have brothers in arms. Individuals you can rely on to guide the way regardless of the odds, to help get the justice. At EvaluCare, we are that trusted partner, with the experience and confidence to burn the boats.


The Origins of "Burn the Boats"

The concept of "burning the boats" traces back to ancient military strategies. Sun Tzu, in his seminal work The Art of War, emphasized the importance of eliminating escape routes to compel full commitment from troops. By destroying their own means of retreat, soldiers were forced to fight with unparalleled determination, knowing that survival depended solely on victory.


This tactic was not merely about physical destruction but about psychological commitment. It signified a point of no return, where the only path forward was through success. Any wavering will most certainly result in the larger adversary winning the battle.


Modern Application: Matt Higgins' Perspective

In his book Burn the Boats: Toss Plan B Overboard and Unleash Your Full Potential, Matt Higgins translates this ancient strategy into a modern context. He argues that true success requires eliminating fallback plans, thereby forcing oneself to commit entirely to the primary goal. Higgins writes, "The mere act of contemplating a Plan B sets in motion a feedback loop that dramatically lessens the probability that Plan A will come to fruition."

This philosophy is particularly relevant for individuals seeking justice in medical malpractice cases. The path is fraught with challenges, but by adopting a "burn the boats" mindset, one can navigate these obstacles with unwavering resolve.


The Challenge of Confronting Healthcare Giants

Pursuing a medical malpractice claim against a large healthcare organization is akin to facing a formidable army. These institutions often have vast resources, experienced legal teams, law firms on retainer, and well-established protocols designed to protect their interests. For patients and families, this can be intimidating.


However, history has shown that determined individuals can effect change. By refusing to back down, they not only seek justice for themselves but also pave the way for systemic improvements that benefit future patients. The fight therefore is greater the single event. It can result in real improvements in care quality that positively impact those that come after.


The Power of Individual Commitment

Consider the case of a patient who suffered due to negligent care. By choosing to confront the responsible organization, they embark on a challenging journey. Yet, their commitment can lead to significant outcomes: policy changes, improved safety protocols, and heightened accountability.


This individual’s resolve embodies the "burn the boats" philosophy. By eliminating the option to retreat, they channel their energy into achieving justice, not just for themselves but for the greater good.


EvaluCare: A Partner in the Pursuit of Justice

Navigating the complexities of a medical malpractice claim requires expertise and support. EvaluCare stands as a valuable ally for patients and families. By providing comprehensive evaluations, guidance, and advocacy, EvaluCare empowers individuals to confront healthcare organizations effectively by arming them with the knowledge they need about the medical care provided.


The first obstacle in any medical malpractice case involving negligence is to cross the river to get to the other side. The river in this metaphor is knowledge. At EvaluCare we help you cross the river of knowledge to get you the answers you deserve, if the harm you incurred is a direct result of negligence. If you get to the other side and come to understand you or a loved one has been harmed due to negligent care, EvaluCare will partner with you on a crusade for justice, whether that is a direct settlement with the healthcare organization, finding an attorney, or partnering with you and attorney to help your case.


EvaluCare’s partnership ensures that patients are not alone in their quest for justice, reinforcing the commitment to see the process through to its rightful conclusion.


A Call to Action

If more individuals embrace this unwavering commitment, our healthcare system might be safer today. Each act of courage contributes to a culture of accountability and continuous improvement.


By adopting the "burn the boats" philosophy, patients and families can drive meaningful change, ensuring that negligence is addressed, and future harm is prevented.


Summary

The journey to justice in medical malpractice cases is arduous, but history and modern insights offer a guiding principle: eliminate retreat, commit fully, and persevere. By burning the boats, individuals signal their unwavering dedication to the cause, inspiring change and fostering a safer healthcare environment for all.

---

Real-Life Triumphs: Individuals Who Confronted Healthcare Giants and Won

To underscore the power of unwavering commitment, here are notable cases where individuals stood against large healthcare organizations and secured justice, making healthcare safer for those who followed:


  1. Allan Navarro vs. Tampa Hospital

In 2000, Allan Navarro visited a Tampa hospital exhibiting clear signs of a stroke. Despite his symptoms and family history, he was misdiagnosed with sinusitis and sent home. The next day, he suffered a massive stroke, leading to severe brain damage and permanent disability. A Florida jury awarded him $216.7 million, one of the largest medical malpractice verdicts in U.S. history.


  1. Tiffany Applewhite vs. New York City

In 1998, 12-year-old Tiffany Applewhite went into anaphylactic shock after receiving a steroid injection. Paramedics arrived without essential life-saving equipment and advised waiting for another ambulance. The delay resulted in severe brain damage and paralysis. A Bronx jury awarded her $172 million, highlighting the consequences of inadequate emergency response.


  1. Faith DeGrand vs. Detroit Medical Center

At age 10, Faith underwent spinal surgery at the Detroit Medical Center. Due to surgical errors and delayed intervention, she became a quadriplegic. In 2018, a jury awarded her $135 million, emphasizing the importance of timely and competent medical care.


  1. Stacy Galette vs. Winthrop-University Hospital

In 2009, Stacy underwent a procedure to remove an ectopic pregnancy. Surgical errors led to severe infections and the amputation of both legs. A Brooklyn jury awarded her $62 million, underscoring the devastating impact of medical negligence.


  1. David Gangaram vs. Pain Institute of Long Island

In 2019, David received an epidural steroid injection that resulted in permanent paralysis. The procedure involved a drug known to cause such injuries if misadministered. In 2025, a Nassau County jury awarded him over $60 million, marking the largest medical malpractice verdict in the county's history.


These cases exemplify the profound impact individuals can have when they choose to confront negligence head-on, reinforcing the "burn the boats" philosophy.


Resources for Patients and Families on Medical Malpractice

Navigating the complexities of medical malpractice requires access to reliable information and support. Here are valuable resources:

  • EvaluCare: Offers comprehensive evaluations and advocacy for patients and families pursuing medical malpractice claims. Visit EvaluCare

  • American Bar Association – Medical Malpractice: Provides an overview of medical malpractice law, including definitions and legal considerations. Learn MorePMC

  • MedlinePlus – Patient Safety: Offers information on how patients can actively participate in their healthcare to prevent errors. Explore Resources

  • DocInfo: A database to verify physicians' credentials and disciplinary history. Check a DoctorPMC+2verywellhealth.com+2verywellhealth.com+2

  • National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB): Provides data on medical malpractice payments and adverse actions. Access DataNPDB

  • Verywell Health – Medical Malpractice Guide: Offers insights into what constitutes malpractice and steps to take if affected. Read Guide

  • PBS Documentary – A World of Hurt: Examines the impact of medical malpractice on patients and the healthcare system.

  • AMA – Medical Liability: Stay updated on developments in medical liability laws and cases. Visit AMA American Medical Association

  • ChartRequest – Top Medical Malpractice Settlements: Provides information on significant malpractice settlements. View Settlements Real Tough Lawyers+1ChartRequest+1

  • Leighton Law – Famous Medical Malpractice Cases: Details notable malpractice cases and their outcomes. [Explore Cases] (https://leightonlaw.com/12-famous-medical-malpractice-c


Learn more at www.EvaluCare.net or email info@EvaluCare.net





Note: This blog post is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. For personalized guidance, consult a qualified attorney.

 

Comments


bottom of page