Navigating Medical Malpractice: Weighing the Pros and Cons of Settlement vs. Trial
- EvaluCare
- May 23
- 4 min read

When faced with the aftermath of medical negligence, patients and their families confront a pivotal decision: should they pursue a settlement or hire an attorney to take the case to trial? Each path carries its own set of advantages and challenges, and the right choice depends on individual circumstances, desired outcomes, and the specifics of the case.
Not all care with some level of negligence rises to the level of medical malpractice. If a partner like EvaluCare has helped you determine that the medical care you received fell below acceptable standards of care, your next step is to be clear on your goals.
Understanding Your Goals
Before deciding on seeking a settlement or hiring an attorney, it's crucial to clarify your objectives. Are you:
Seeking Public Accountability: If your primary goal is to hold the healthcare provider publicly accountable, a trial might offer the visibility you desire.
Desiring a Swift Resolution: If timely compensation and closure are paramount, a settlement could provide a more expedient path.
Understanding these goals will guide your decision-making process and help align your strategy with your personal needs for resolution and closure.
Advantages of Settling a Medical Malpractice Case
Expedited Resolution: Settlements typically conclude faster than trials, often within three to 24 months, allowing victims to receive compensation sooner.
Predictable Outcomes: By agreeing to settlement terms, both parties avoid the unpredictability of a jury verdict.
Reduced Legal Costs: Settling can significantly lower expenses related to court fees, expert witnesses, and attorney fees.
Privacy Preservation: Settlements are often confidential, protecting personal and medical information from public disclosure.
Emotional Relief: Avoiding the adversarial nature of a trial can reduce stress and emotional toll on victims and their families.
Higher Portion of Settlement: Getting a hire portion of a smaller direct settlement may be advantageous, considering attorney and legal bills may eat up over 50% of a settlement.
Disadvantages of Settling a Medical Malpractice Case
Potentially Lower Compensation: Settlements may result in lower financial awards compared to jury verdicts.
Lack of Public Accountability: Settlements often include no admission of wrongdoing, which might not satisfy those seeking public acknowledgment of negligence.
No Precedent Set: Without a court decision, the case doesn't contribute to legal precedents that could influence future medical practices.
Finality of Agreement: Once settled, you typically cannot pursue further legal action related to the incident.
Advantages of Going to Trial
Higher Potential Compensation: Successful trials can result in substantial awards, including punitive damages, especially in severe cases.
Public Accountability: Trials are public records, bringing attention to medical negligence and potentially prompting systemic changes.
Legal Precedent: A court ruling can set a precedent, influencing future cases and medical standards.
Disadvantages of Going to Trial
Extended Duration: Trials can take several years to conclude, prolonging emotional and financial strain.
Uncertain Outcomes: Jury decisions are unpredictable, and there's a risk of receiving no compensation. The majority of medical malpractices decisions go to the defense.
Higher Costs: Legal fees, expert witness costs, and court expenses can accumulate, potentially reducing net compensation.
Public Exposure: Trials are open to the public, which may lead to unwanted attention and scrutiny.
Making the Right Choice for You
Deciding between settlement and trial is deeply personal and depends on various factors, including the strength of your case, desired outcomes, and personal circumstances. Consulting with experienced professionals can provide clarity and guidance tailored to your situation.
How EvaluCare Can Assist
At EvaluCare, we specialize in reviewing medical records and providing expert insights to help you understand the merits of your case. Our team of healthcare quality and medical professionals experts collaborate to offer comprehensive evaluations, empowering you to make informed decisions. We know healthcare organizations, hospitals and healthcare systems from the inside out, with the majority of our team holding or having held executive level positions dealing with negligent care issues. We are a passionate group of healthcare professionals that have switched sides to support patients and families.
Whether you're considering a settlement or contemplating a trial, EvaluCare stands by your side, ensuring your voice is heard and your rights are protected.
Additional Resources
EvaluCare: Expert reviews and guidance on medical malpractice cases.
American Bar Association – Medical Malpractice: Comprehensive information on medical malpractice laws and procedures.
MedlinePlus – Patient Safety: Resources on patient safety and preventing medical errors.
DocInfo: Tool to verify physicians' credentials and disciplinary history.
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB): Database of medical malpractice payments and adverse actions.
Verywell Health – Medical Malpractice Guide: In-depth guide on understanding and navigating medical malpractice.
PBS Documentary – A World of Hurt: Exploration of the impact of medical malpractice on patients and the healthcare system.
AMA – Medical Liability: Information on medical liability and malpractice issues.
ChartRequest – Top Medical Malpractice Settlements: Details on significant malpractice settlements.
Leighton Law – Famous Medical Malpractice Cases: Insights into notable malpractice cases and their outcomes.
Choosing between settling a medical malpractice claim and going to trial is a significant decision with lasting implications. By understanding the pros and cons of each option and seeking expert guidance, you can navigate this challenging process with confidence and clarity.
For compassionate medical care review and support, contact EvaluCare today.

Comments