" "
top of page

As Behavioral Management Issues in Hospitals Increases, Compliance to TJC PC.01.03.03 Likely to Decrease Increasing Medical Malpractice

  • Writer: EvaluCare
    EvaluCare
  • Jun 3
  • 5 min read

As patients live longer with chronic diseases like Dementia and Alzheimer's, behavioral management will likely increase in the coming years.
As patients live longer with chronic diseases like Dementia and Alzheimer's, behavioral management will likely increase in the coming years.

As the US population ages, hospitals are encountering a growing number of older adults presenting with cognitive impairments such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. These conditions can lead to a range of behavioral challenges, from agitation and wandering to aggression and paranoia, that make medical and surgical units particularly vulnerable to safety and care planning failures. Behavioral management is no longer an isolated concern for psychiatric units; it is now a central issue for general hospitals across the country. Even for hospitals with good plans in place will be challenged with the scope of the problem and protocols being carried out in areas with less experience staff.


This evolving landscape places increasing importance on compliance with The Joint Commission Standard PC.01.03.03 – “The Hospital Defines Its Behavioral Management Policies.” This standard requires hospitals to not only define but implement and evaluate behavioral management strategies in a way that protects patient rights, ensures safety, and complies with legal and ethical mandates.

In this blog, we’ll examine this critical standard and its Elements of Performance (EPs), explore real-world malpractice cases where failures in behavioral management led to patient harm, and highlight how EvaluCare serves as a resource for families, patients, and attorneys in identifying substandard care.


Understanding Standard PC.01.03.03

This standard sets the expectation that hospitals must develop, document, and follow clear policies to manage patient behavior safely and respectfully. Importantly, these policies must align with legal and ethical standards — particularly regarding patients who are unable to advocate for themselves, like those with dementia or Alzheimer’s.


Element of Performance 1

The hospital defines the types of interventions used to manage patient behavior.


Example:

A hospital must clearly delineate which interventions are permissible — such as verbal de-escalation, medication, or, as a last resort, physical restraints. Policies should define when these interventions are appropriate and outline a hierarchy of responses.


Case Study:

In a widely publicized case in Florida (2019), a 78-year-old patient with dementia was restrained without physician order or assessment after becoming agitated during an IV insertion. The restraints led to bruising, immobility, and a rapid decline in condition. The court found that the hospital’s behavioral policies were vague and inconsistently applied — a breach of duty that contributed to medical malpractice.


Element of Performance 2

The hospital uses interventions only as permitted by law and regulation.


Example:

Interventions such as chemical sedation or physical restraint must meet strict legal standards. These typically require physician oversight, documentation of necessity, and frequent reassessment.


Case Study:

In Massachusetts (2021), a hospital was sued after administering sedatives to a non-consenting patient with Alzheimer’s who was resisting a routine catheterization. The patient fell into a coma and later died. The hospital lacked a protocol for behavioral intervention in patients lacking decision-making capacity, and the use of medication without legal authority was central to the lawsuit.


Element of Performance 3

The hospital trains staff in the use of behavioral management techniques.


Example:

Behavioral health training must be given to nurses, aides, and clinicians, especially those on units where cognitive impairment is common (e.g., geriatrics, medical-surgical). Training includes verbal de-escalation, non-coercive communication, and how to recognize early signs of agitation.


Case Study:

In Illinois, a nurse was assaulted by a dementia patient after she attempted to reposition him without explaining what she was doing. The patient, fearing he was under attack, reacted violently. The hospital had not trained staff in dementia communication techniques, and the incident led to injuries and a workers' compensation lawsuit, as well as a malpractice claim by the patient’s family, who argued that behavioral mismanagement contributed to the escalation.


Element of Performance 4

The hospital evaluates and documents behavioral interventions.

Example:

Hospitals must document when behavioral interventions are used, the rationale, the patient’s response, and the follow-up plan. Failure to document is both a clinical and legal risk.


Case Study:

In a Texas case (2022), a 65-year-old patient with frontotemporal dementia was chemically sedated several times during a three-day hospital stay. None of the interventions were documented in the electronic health record. When the patient aspirated and died, the family sued. Discovery revealed no behavioral policy documentation, no physician orders, and no rationale for sedation. The jury awarded $3.4 million.


Element of Performance 5

The hospital uses the least restrictive intervention necessary to ensure safety.


Example:

Hospitals must show that all less restrictive methods (e.g., distraction, redirection) were attempted before resorting to medications or restraints.


Case Study:

An elderly man hospitalized for pneumonia in Ohio developed confusion and agitation — likely due to delirium. Instead of investigating reversible causes or using non-pharmacologic techniques, the staff restrained him to the bed, leading to pressure sores and sepsis. The court ruled that noncompliance with PC.01.03.03 EP5 was a breach of standard care, awarding the family damages for neglect.


Why This Standard Matters More Than Ever

Behavioral health management is not optional. As the aging population grows, general hospitals, not just psychiatric units, are on the front lines of managing behavior in patients with dementia, delirium, schizophrenia, and other complex conditions. A failure to plan for this behavioral complexity often results in:

  • Physical injury to patients or staff

  • Prolonged hospitalizations

  • Increased risk of malpractice

  • Emotional trauma for families

  • Regulatory violations and fines


Recognizing the signs of poor behavioral management is crucial. Warning signs include:

  • Repeated use of restraints or sedation

  • Lack of staff communication

  • Agitation or aggression that escalates over time

  • Inconsistent documentation

  • Staff complaints about “difficult patients”

  • Family reports of unexplained bruising or injuries


Conclusion

As hospitals grapple with an increasing number of older patients living with behavioral and cognitive challenges, the importance of clearly defined behavioral management policies has never been greater. The Joint Commission Standard PC.01.03.03 provides the blueprint for safe, ethical, and effective management, but it is only effective if implemented correctly.


When these standards are ignored, real patients suffer, and so do their families. Through organizations like EvaluCare, those harmed can find answers and accountability. And for hospitals, there’s a path forward: train staff, define clear policies, prioritize non-restrictive care, and document every step. Because behavioral health isn’t just a psychiatric issue anymore, it’s everyone’s responsibility.


How EvaluCare Supports Families, Patients, and Legal Professionals


EvaluCare provides expert review services to determine if a hospital followed Joint Commission standards like PC.01.03.03. For patients harmed by poor behavioral planning,


EvaluCare can:

  • Assess if hospital policies were defined and followed

  • Analyze the use of restraints or medications

  • Determine if staff were adequately trained

  • Review if less restrictive interventions were attempted

  • Offer expert opinions in potential malpractice litigation


Attorneys often turn to EvaluCare for evidence-based insights during litigation involving dementia, Alzheimer’s, or other cognitive issues. Families also benefit from clear, objective information about whether a loved one’s suffering could have been prevented.


Explore EvaluCare Services Here: www.evalucare.net (Fictional placeholder link)







Resources and Additional Reading



Comentários


bottom of page