" "
top of page

Informed Consent and Your Rights

  • Writer: EvaluCare
    EvaluCare
  • Feb 15, 2020
  • 5 min read

Updated: May 20


When it comes to a treatment relationship between a healthcare provider and a patient implied consent, consent to treat and informed consent are types of consent for care. Each are different, each are important.


Informed consent is a critical part of the treatment relationship between a healthcare provider and a patient.
Informed consent is a critical part of the treatment relationship between a healthcare provider and a patient.

Implied Consent

Implied Consent is driven primarily driven by a patient’s actions and behaviors. A patient seeks care and calls a doctor’s office for an appointment. The call or seeking of care implies there is consent to get treatment. This would not constitute a legal relationship. It is a simply understanding a patient seeks care.

 

Consent to Treat, Medical Consent & Medication Authorization Form

There are forms you are likely familiar signing that provides a general less specific consent to treat. It may be signed in a healthcare provider’s office prior to being seen. A school may require a Medication Authorization Form to be signed to give a nurse permission to provide Tylenol for a headache, or perhaps medication for a medical or mental health condition. These consents are more formal and specific than implied consent, which does not require a form to be signed.

 

Informed Consent

Informed Consent is very specific and required by law prior to a healthcare provider delivering care to a patient. The premise for informed consent is that patients have autonomy over their care. In other words, patients get to decide what type of care they receive.

 

The only exception to gaining informed consent is in emergency situations, where a physician may initiate treatment without informed consent from a patient or a decision maker for the patient, often called a surrogate. If this occurs, a physician will make the surrogate or patient aware of the decisions at the earliest possible moment.

 

When care is not urgently needed, and/or when the patient or surrogate cannot provide informed consent, it is required. Informed consent creates a legal agreement between the healthcare provider and the patient regarding the medical treatment being provided. With this agreement certain standards must be met for informed consent to be valid for both parties. Signing an informed consent document does not constitute an agreement unless basic criteria are met.  The basic elements of informed consent below:

 

Patient (or Decision-Making Surrogate) Capacity

A patient providing informed consent must be capable of or have the capacity to make a medical decision. A surrogate can provide this on the patient’s behalf if the patient so chooses and/or if the surrogate has been given permission to do so legally. A patient must do so with their own free will.



A decision-making surrogate can provide consent on behalf of the patient.
A decision-making surrogate can provide consent on behalf of the patient.

Consent Must Be Provided with Free Will

There must be no coercion. The patient must voluntarily provide his/her consent.

 

Disclosure by Healthcare

The healthcare provider must provide clear information about the condition or diagnosis that exists and the treatment that is being provided in a way that is understandable to a patient. This may mean that a patient must be provided with an interpreter service. The risks and benefits of the treatment and the respective probability or likelihood of risks occurring along with alternatives must be clear to the patient. The patient should understand alternatives and likely outcomes for not getting the treatment.

 

The health care provider should be present, able to answer questions about all of the above. Information should be thorough and detailed. The consent should be documented in a clear manner that matches the conversation that occurs.

 

Information Provided Must Be Understood

A patient or surrogate must understand the treatment being performed and the risks and benefits of the treatment and also of not getting the treatment. There should be an opportunity for a discussion. There should be an opportunity for a physician to gage the understanding of the patient or surrogate. Information should be provided in a patient’s native language and interpreter services should be provided if necessary to ensure the patient understands.

 

Informed Consent Pitfalls

Be aware that informed consent documents provided to a patient to sign are often poorly written and administered. They are often written in generic form, to cover all potential scenarios and risks, many of which may have never been mentioned by a healthcare provider.  If you read on a consent form an adverse potential outcome of a surgery that has never been discussed with a healthcare provider, raise that concern.

 

Over time, consent forms suffer from added language, sentences and lines that may not go well together. Parts may be incomprehensible. Informed consents often are not updated appropriately to account for variation by physicians and their exact procedure performed and include so much risk management language that it can interfere with the description of the treatment and ultimately a patient’s understanding.

 

An informed consent should not be provided to a patient by a nurse, who asks please sign this. If that occurs, the spirit and legality of informed consent have not been met.

 

The gold standard for obtaining informed consent is from a direct interaction between a medical provider and his/her patient, family and/or surrogate.

 

The healthcare provider should meet with a patient and family to discuss the treatment, risks, benefits and respective probabilities of occurrence of adverse outcomes. Patients should understand the treatment and risks and benefits and what they are consenting to. The healthcare provider is the most experienced and capable person of answer the questions accurately because they are delivering the treatment. If a direct conversation does not occur, it is possible informed consent was not gained properly.

 

If a patient cannot sense that a physician is making an effort to gage their understanding of a procedure, be wary.

 

The best practice for ensuring both the patient and physician work collaboratively together on decision making about treatment is called “Shared Decision Making.”

 

Challenges with Informed Consent Management

The reality is informed consent is often operationalized into the healthcare providers processes external to the physician workflows. In fact, in some cases multiple physicians may be on a consent, multiple procedures may be listed because the exact process may not be known at the time of consent.

 

A physician may also ask take place during a surgery, alternatives methods and procedures may need to be performed and should and must be also consented to. That is often a good thing.

 

EvaluCare provides medical care review services for patients, families and attorneys. We are a dedicated and trusted team of practicing medical professionals. If you have concerns about the care you, a loved one or a client received, EvaluCare can arm victims with the knowledge they need to get the settlements they deserve. If you or a loved one needs medical care reviewed, email info@EvaluCare.net or visit EvaluCare.net



Comments


bottom of page