Ongoing & Focused Professional Practice Evaluation: Essential for Ensuring Quality and Preventing Medical Errors
- EvaluCare
- May 26
- 6 min read
Updated: May 27

In an era when patient safety and care quality have never been under greater scrutiny, health systems rely on robust mechanisms to evaluate, and continually improve, the performance of their clinical staff.
Two critical components of this oversight are Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE). These structured processes are not only required for regulatory and accreditation standards but also serve as early warning systems for performance issues, reducing medical errors and enhancing patient outcomes. For patients, families, and attorneys, understanding OPPE and FPPE can illuminate whether a provider’s practice met expected standards, or if a pattern of negligence contributed to adverse events. It is an area that should not be overlooked during the discovery process to get a clear picture of the provider and the service to understand the level of quality related to medical errors and malpractice.
Its an area where EvaluCare and its quality and clinical experts have spent considerable time and focus on developing OPPE/FPPE Programs in health systems. It's an area of hospital operations where complaints about care should get special attention. It can be a repository of errors for providers delivering lower quality care leading to patient harm.
This blog explores the importance of OPPE/FPPE to quality and how to use it when care goes wrong.
What Is OPPE?
Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) is a systematic, retrospective performance review applied to every practitioner with clinical privileges. Key characteristics include:
Frequency: Conducted at least every 6–12 months, depending on hospital policy and service line risk profiles.
Data Sources: Utilizes a mix of objective metrics—such as mortality rates, infection rates, length of stay, readmission rates—and subjective feedback from peers, leadership, and patient satisfaction surveys.
Scope: Applies to all services where providers hold privileges, from general surgery to radiology to anesthesia.
Purpose:
Monitor ongoing clinical performance.
Identify trends that may signal skill erosion, knowledge gaps, or system issues.
Guide ongoing professional development and remedial actions.
OPPE is both a quality assurance and a quality improvement tool, ensuring that each provider continues to meet the standards under which they were originally credentialed and that are considered essential to deliver acceptable standards of care to patients on the service.
What Is FPPE?
Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE) is a definitional breakpoint from OPPE. It is triggered when:
A new practitioner initially joins the medical staff (often during the first 6–12 months).
A current practitioner’s performance falls below established benchmarks during OPPE.
A significant event (e.g., sentinel event, complaint) raises concerns about a provider’s competence.
Key aspects of FPPE include:
Shorter Duration: Typically spans 90 days or until a minimum number of observations/cases (e.g., 10–20) are completed.
Intensive Monitoring: Direct observation, chart reviews, proctoring, and outcome tracking specific to the provider’s area.
Goal‐Oriented: Focuses on verifying or refuting concerns about a provider’s clinical competence.
Possible Outcomes:
Full privileging if performance meets defined criteria
Targeted remediation (additional training, mentoring) if partial gaps are identified
Restriction or loss of privileges if significant, persistent deficiencies exist
FPPE serves as a safe gateway, allowing careful integration of new staff and timely intervention for concerns.
Regulatory & Accreditation Requirements
The Joint Commission
Standard MS.06.01.03 – Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation: The hospital collects and analyzes data on practitioner performance, including outcomes, adverse events, and peer feedback.
Standard MS.06.01.05 – Focused Professional Practice Evaluation: The hospital has a defined process for FPPE when initiating or modifying privileges or when performance issues arise.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Conditions of Participation for hospitals (42 CFR 482.22) require credentialing and privileging processes, including ongoing evaluation of practitioner performance.
State Medical Boards & Specialty Societies
Many states mandate periodic performance reviews or maintenance of certification (MOC), reinforcing the importance of structured evaluation.
Core Components of OPPE & FPPE Programs
Regardless of service line, every hospital’s OPPE and FPPE processes should include:
Defined Metrics & Thresholds
Clinical Outcomes: Mortality, complication rates, infection rates
Process Measures: Timeliness of documentation, adherence to protocols (e.g., prophylactic antibiotics in surgery)
Patient Experience: Satisfaction scores, complaint rates
Data Collection & Analytics
Integration with the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and data warehouses
Benchmarking against internal peers and national standards (e.g., Vizient, NSQIP)
Multidisciplinary Review
Medical Staff Office (MSO) coordinates physician leaders, quality specialists, and risk managers
Peer review committees examine cases and metrics in context
Documentation & Reporting
Individual practitioner dashboards
Summaries for Medical Executive Committee and Board quality oversight
Remediation Plans
Tailored education, proctoring, or mentorship
Regular touchpoints and re‐evaluation
In FPPE, these steps are accelerated and intensified, zeroing in on specific practice areas or events.
Why OPPE & FPPE Are Critical to Patient Safety
Early Detection of Performance Drift
Physicians’ skills and knowledge can erode over time or as practice patterns evolve. OPPE catches downward trends before patient harm occurs.
Structured Responses to Concerns
FPPE provides a standardized framework for addressing clinical competence issues, reducing ad‑hoc or reactive approaches.
Link to Privileging
Successful OPPE is a prerequisite for continued clinical privileges; inadequate performance can lead to restrictions, ensuring only qualified practitioners deliver care.
Legal & Risk Management Value
Thorough OPPE/FPPE documentation demonstrates due diligence in privileging and can be an asset in defending medical malpractice allegations by showing institutional vigilance.
Literature Support
Boohaker et al. (2018): Hospitals with mature OPPE programs demonstrated 20% fewer adverse events compared to peers without such programs.
Feldman & Fukui (2020): Case series showing early FPPE intervention in 15 practitioners prevented placement of 4 underperforming physicians in permanent roles.
NSQIP & Vizient Benchmarking: Institutions that tie OPPE metrics to NSQIP outcomes have shown significant drops in surgical site infections and 30‑day readmissions.
Integrating OPPE & FPPE into Everyday Practice
Role of the Medical Staff Office
Coordination Hub: Manages notifications for FPPE triggers (new privileges, event reports).
Scheduler: Ensures timely data pulls for OPPE.
Repository: Maintains secure files, tracking remediation plans and evaluation results.
Technology Enables Efficiency
EHR Dashboards: Automated tracking of individual metrics.
Alert Systems: Flag outliers in real time (e.g., mortality rates ≥2 SD above mean).
Reporting Tools: Generate tailored FPPE packets with chart abstracts, peer comments, and patient outcomes.
OPPE & FPPE in Medical Malpractice Context
For attorneys and patient advocates, OPPE/FPPE records can be powerful evidence:
Demonstrated Trends: Repeated OPPE alerts about high complication rates bolster claims of systemic issues.
FPPE Findings: Formal remedial recommendations or proctoring requests reveal early recognition of performance deficiencies.
Gap Analysis: Absence of any OPPE reviews for a long‑standing practitioner may indicate lapses in institutional oversight.
Hospital Committment: The robustness of an OPPE/FPPE program goes a long way is reflecting a hospital or health system's committment to quality. A poorly defined program, lacking systematic measurement and goal setting can be a reflection of poor committment to quality.
EvaluCare’s Expertise in OPPE & FPPE
EvaluCare’s team includes former heads of quality, chief medical officers, and quality experts who all have supported the priveledging and credentialing of hospital medial staff who have:
Designed & Run OPPE Programs at major health systems.
Developed Tailored FPPE Protocols to address specialty‐specific needs (e.g., interventional cardiology, neurosurgery).
Managed Remediation Plans for practitioners requiring additional skills or knowledge, up to and including termination.
Conducted Peer Review & Case Study Analyses under Just Culture principles
When medical errors occur, and cases make it to discovery, our experts can guide discovery and review OPPE/FPPE documentation, assess adequacy of processes, and provide actionable insights for attorneys.
Conclusion
OPPE and FPPE are foundational to safe, high‑quality healthcare delivery. They provide structured, data‑driven, and peer‐reviewed mechanisms to ensure clinicians—new and seasoned—uphold the highest practice standards. For patients and families, understanding these processes underscores why where you receive care and who provides it truly matters. And for legal advocates, OPPE/FPPE records can illuminate patterns of negligence or system failures critical to medical malpractice cases.
EvaluCare brings unparalleled expertise in OPPE and FPPE program design, management, and review—partnering with hospitals, patients, and attorneys to shine a light on performance issues and drive safer outcomes for all.
For more information for patients, families and attorneys and to engage EvaluCare’s medical care review services, visit: EvaluCare Medical Care Review Services.
Learn more at www.EvaluCare.net EvaluCare Medical Care Review Services or email info@EvaluCare.net

---
Helpful References
The Joint Commission MS Standards: ICU–2019 Manual, Chapter MS.06
CMS Conditions of Participation: 42 CFR 482.22
NSQIP Program: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/american-college-surgeons-national-surgical-quality-improvement-program/
Vizient Quality & Accountability: https://www.vizientinc.com/solutions/quality-and-patient-safety
Comments