Care Location Matters: Quality, Expertise, and Patient Safety
- EvaluCare
- May 26
- 6 min read
Updated: 2 days ago
When it comes to your health, or the health of someone you love, the hospital you choose isn’t just a backdrop for care; it’s an active ingredient in your outcome. Hospitals differ widely in their ability to diagnose and treat complex conditions accurately, manage unexpected complications, and deliver the latest, most effective treatments. At one facility, you might encounter a multidisciplinary team of specialists who have performed hundreds of a particular surgery, while at another, you might find that procedure performed only a handful of times each year.
Infection rates, mortality statistics, and readmission figures can diverge sharply, even among hospitals in the same city, revealing stark differences in safety protocols, staffing levels, and institutional expertise, especially in the space of quality leadership.
Beyond raw numbers, the infrastructure for advanced therapies, such as immunotherapies for cancer, robotic-assisted surgeries, or participation in clinical trials, often resides only at large academic centers or regional referral hospitals. Smaller community or rural hospitals, while indispensable for everyday emergency care, most lack these specialized services, and the specialist teams needed to support them.
By examining workforce trends (where often medical debt-ridden new physicians gravitate, and which hospitals struggle to recruit experienced talent), national quality rankings (CMS Star Ratings, Vizient benchmarks), and peer-reviewed studies on volume–outcome relationships, we can see a clear pattern: hospital characteristics directly influence patient safety, complication rates, and long-term recovery.
In the sections that follow, we’ll unpack these factors in detail, arming you with the knowledge you need to make informed decisions about where to seek care when it matters most.
The Talent Gap: Why Small & Rural Hospitals Struggle
Reliance on Mid‑Levels and Locum Tenens
Rural Health Shortages: Nearly three‑quarters (71%) of locum tenens assignments occur in Health Professional Shortage Areas, filling critical gaps in underserved regions CHG Healthcare Blog.
Use of Mid‑Levels: Many small hospitals rely heavily on nurse practitioners and physician assistants, often without sufficient physician oversight, which can impact diagnostic accuracy and care coordination.
Challenges in Attracting Top Talent
Medical School Debt: With median medical school debt exceeding $200,000, new physicians often choose large health systems that offer higher salaries, signing bonuses, and loan‑repayment programs.
Volume‑Driven Income: Hospital systems with high patient volumes and lucrative specialties (e.g., cardiology, oncology) can pay more, while small community hospitals struggle to match these packages.
Impact on Quality
Turnover & Continuity: High use of short‑term locums undermines continuity of care. Research links frequent provider changes to increased readmission rates and medication errors.
Specialization Gaps: Rural facilities often lack in‑house specialists (e.g., neurosurgeons, interventional, sub-specialized radiologists) needed for complex cases, forcing patient transfers and treatment delays.
Size & Specialization: Academic Centers vs. Community Hospitals
Access to Cutting‑Edge Treatments
Clinical Trials & Research: Prestigious centers like Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins, and Memorial Sloan Kettering host hundreds of trials in oncology, cardiology, and rare diseases, offering therapies unavailable elsewhere. For example:
CAR‑T Cell Therapy for refractory leukemia at University of Pennsylvania
Novel immunotherapies in melanoma at Massachusetts General Hospital
Cross‑Disciplinary Expertise
Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Academic systems convene oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and genetic counselors to tailor precision medicine for each patient presenting with complex needs.
Complex Case Experience: Larger systems treat higher volumes of complex surgeries, coronary bypass, transplants, neurovascular interventions, which correlates with better outcomes.
Objective Quality Measures: Ranking & Data
CMS Overall Star Ratings
Five‑Star Scale: Based on 48 measures across mortality, safety, readmissions, patient experience, and timeliness.
Proven Correlation: Studies show hospitals with 4–5 stars have significantly lower mortality and complication rates than 1–2 star facilities PMC.
Vizient Quality & Accountability Study
Benchmarking: Vizient’s annual assessment ranks hospitals on metrics such as length of stay, complication rates, and equity.
Top Performers: Systems like Novant Health use these insights to drive systemwide improvements, reducing variation and enhancing patient safety Vizient.
Publicly Available Tool
Hospital Compare (CMS): Compare star ratings, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction.
Core Quality Indicators: What to Research
When evaluating hospitals, focus on these outcomes:
Mortality Rates: Lower risk‑adjusted death rates for conditions like heart attack or pneumonia.
Complication Rates: Fewer surgical site infections (SSI) and post‐operative complications.
Readmission Rates: Low 30‑day readmission signals good discharge planning and follow‑up care.
Infection Rates: Hospital‑acquired conditions (CLABSI, CAUTI) reflect IPC program strength.
Patient Experience: High scores for communication, responsiveness, and discharge instructions.
Practical Steps for Patients & Families
Use Public Ratings: Check CMS star ratings before elective or complex procedures.
Ask About Volumes: Inquire how many times the hospital or surgeon performs your proposed procedure annually.
Verify Specialty Services: Confirm availability of required subspecialists (e.g., stroke neurologist, transplant surgeon).
Confirm Data Sharing: Sign any “share my record” authorizations to ensure complete medical history flows between providers, especially when getting care out of Network and region.
Request Care Team Introductions: Meet your primary surgeon, anesthesiologist, and nursing leads before admission.
Why “One‐Size‐Fits‐All” Doesn’t Work
Volume‐Outcome Relationship: Research demonstrates that higher procedure volumes correlate with lower complication rates in cardiac surgery, joint replacement, and complex cancer resections.
Resource Availability: Smaller facilities may lack dedicated rapid response teams, catheterization labs, or 24/7 ICU coverage, vital for emergent complications.
Quality Culture: Top hospitals invest heavily in staff education, safety huddles, and continuous improvement processes, creating a culture where errors are rapidly identified and resolved.
Conclusion: Your Health, Your Decision
Not all hospitals are equal and in matters of life and health, that reality can mean the difference between a smooth recovery and avoidable hardship. By leveraging public quality data, understanding facility capabilities, you can make informed choices and advocate for the safest, highest‑quality care possible.
How Organizations Like EvaluCare Are Leveling The Playing Field: Expert Record Review
EvaluCare is supporting small and critical access hospital with near real time Smart AI technology to review medical care and provide clinicians with feedback on care quality. For hospitals who use the technology, they will have access to constant assessment of performance, leading to improved quality performance.
---
Eva, EvaluCare’s AI-powered SaaS, delivers quality review for inpatient care by checking adherence to thousands of evidence-based guidelines and protocols. It identifies care gaps, routes clear actions to the right clinicians, and accelerates improvement cycles, strengthening documentation and coding while reducing HACs, HAIs readmissions, length of stay and more. The result is an ROI, starting in the seven figures even for critical access hospitals. Learn more at evalucare.net or contact info@evalucare.net.
---
About the Author
Jason Minor is a healthcare quality and transformation leader with nearly 30 years of continuous improvement experience. A Certified Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, Certified Professional in Healthcare Quality, Certified Professional in Patient Safety, and Certified Utilization Review Professional, he has led thousands of end‑to‑end improvement projects, mentored dozens of quality professionals, and pioneered healthcare SaaS innovations.
As Board Chair of the Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care, Jason has partnered with hospitals, non‑profits, and state agencies to elevate patient safety and care quality statewide. Previously, as Network Vice President of Quality at the UVM Health Network and through the Jeffords Institute for Quality, he guided the redesign of a system‑wide quality framework and led initiatives that achieved a number‑one patient safety ranking among the nation’s top academic medical centers.
In 2020, Jason founded EvaluCare to help organizations shift from episodic improvement to a robust quality assurance approach.
EvaluCare’s Eva platform leverages AI‑powered natural language processing, machine learning, and agentic orchestration to analyze and improve inpatient care and support comprehensive quality, mortality, peer, and utilization reviews.
Jason Minor, EvaluCare Executive Director
Network Director Continuous Systems Improvement Jeffords Institute for Quality UVM Health
Board Chair Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care Inc.,
Vice Chair Northwestern Counseling & Support Services, Inc
Lecturer UVM College of Nursing & Health Sciences in Healthcare Quality
Quality Peer Reviewer Vermont Care Partners: Centers of Excellence
---
References
“Study finds 71% of locum tenens assignments in HPSA areas,” CHG Healthcare CHG Healthcare Blog
CMS Hospital Compare: Overall Star Ratings methodology CMS Data
Vizient Announces Top Performers in Clinical Quality—Novant Health Case Vizient
Volume-Outcome Relationship in Surgery, JAMA Surgery, 2017.
Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grades.
Healthgrades Hospital Quality Ratings.
For expert case review and guidance on potential medical errors:EvaluCare Medical Care Review Services
