Contact Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
Contact Us




Contact Us
Contact Us
Service Focus Areas


Review every inpatient discharge to boost quality and outcomes without adding headcount with the Eva SaaS by EvaluCare.
Our AI reviews 100% of inpatient care to help reduce readmissions, length of stay, HACs, and HAIs, while strengthening bundle compliance, improving documentation, and preventing adverse events (CLABSI, CAUTI, CDI, falls, HAPI). Empower your quality and clinical teams to drive safer, more effective care and lower cost and risk. Start now, schedule a demo.


How Eva Works (3 Simple Steps)
-
Load/Ingest EHR Medical Records/Files - Secure, Encrypted, Easy
-
Hospital Selects Focus - Reviews are targeted for the purpose, whether for quality reviews, mortality review, M&M, peer review, or utilization review.
-
Get Actionable Insights - Eva identifies regulatory/accreditation standards, care guidelines, documentation gaps/opportunities, common payor programs requirements, treatment protocols, omissions in care and more to identify patient safety, quality, legal and clinical risks. (Surfaces high-impact gaps (e.g. sepsis care, VTE Prophylaxis, med rec...)
-
Share the Insights - Reviews are the basis for hospital quality assurance programs, where the completed reviews are provided to clinicians to improve care. Tracking and trending data provides in-depth insights into care quality.
-
Dashboards & Scorecards - Review summarization can be fed to performance dashboards and scorecards for service, hospital and health system performance management.
-
Facilitated Performance Improvement Management - Skilled performance improvement facilitators manage health service, hospital or health system performance improvement learning collaboratives to turn information into actions.
-
Close the Loop: Assign, document, track resolution, feed back to rounds.
-
-
Why Hospitals Choose Eva
Quality Assurance: Reviews engage clinicians to act more real time on care affecting their patients.
Review Rate: Eva does 100% reviews of all inpatients. Hospitals review on average 1-3% of all inpatients.
Review Insights: Going from 2% care reviews to 100% produces 4,900% greater insights into care.
Clinician Engagement: Care review insights specific to their inpatients, enhancing engagement.
Independent Analysis: Unbiased reviews ensure absolute integrity of the care evaluation.
Return on Investment: Returns for a hospital or health system with 45,000 annual reviews produce a return of $61M to $137M annually.
Performance Improvement Opportunity
1-3%
100% Review
4,900% Greater Care Insights
=
AI Technology: Smart Agentic AI framework and review algorithms built on decades of experience of health system quality improves patient care and safety, while decreasing legal risk, financial penalties, labor expense.
Faster Turnaround: Quality reviews performed by hospital clinical analysts take several days, if not weeks. Eva's records to reviews are fast.
Affordable: Eva review costs are less than clinical analyst and medical staffing costs, which produces a positive ROI, even without calculating improvement actions.
Attainable: Eva provides reviews that would otherwise require hiring dozens of clinical analysts to do care review, making 100% review attainable for the first time.
Detailed Reports: 20x higher quality and more comprehensive reviews with unsurpassed standard, guideline, protocol insights for greater compliance and quality.
Hospitals only review 1-3% of inpatients discharged.
Pay-As-You-Go: No subscription. Only pay for what you need when you need it. Customer may want to focus on 100% review for high risk services.
Convenient: Works from any computer. No delays. Available to all users. Centralized management with reviews and documents exportable to other systems.
Workflow Integration: Seamlessly integrates with any care review workflow.
Status Updates: Progress bar and email notifications to improve communication.
Ease of Use & Case Efficiency: Manages case files in a central location.
Top Level Experts: Healthcare quality experts designed.
Systems Approach: Eva goes beyond the record, finding care omissions, systems issues beyond the documentation. Eva proactively identifies clinical care guidelines, medical staff training/credentialing, regulatory standards that may need to be adjusted to improve care quality.
Workflow Improvements: Allows clinical analysts time spent conducting reviews can be redeployed closer to care to adjudicate issues identified, enhancing quality.
Eliminates Workflow Steps: Efficient redesign of internal processes, decreasing steps in the typical medical review workflow.
Customer Alignment to Needs: Customer enters the review focus to meet the exact review focus. Can inform the review algorithm with specific concerns.
Care Setting Flexibility: Whether a nursing home, ambulatory setting, critical access, community or tertiary care site, Eva support care review in all care settings.
Innovation: Eva's first-in-the-nation 100% medical care reviews giving customers an information advantage to transform care quality and measured quality perrformance.
Medical Reviews Shouldn't Slow You Down
Current Pain Points of Care Reviews (Before Eva Adoption):
-
Clinical analyst, nurse and physician reviewers tend to avoid potential of finger pointing, which can create a biased result.
-
Reviews only focused on patients with known quality failures in a reactive approach, leading to oversights of 97% of inpatient care.
-
Only a few skilled clinical analyst reviewers exist in most organization.

-
Initial reviews often only include a basic care review and medical chronology with highlighted concerns that must then be adjudicated by clinicians. Insights provided later by clinicians.
-
Clinical analyst variation/skills skes results.
-
Turnover of clinical analyst creates variability.
-
Reviews can take weeks, based on meeting cadence.
-
Reviews often disconnected from clinical teams, managed in quality, patient safety, compliance, risk and medical staff offices, resulting in additional steps and barriers in communicating results to clinical teams to improve care.
-
Missed critical details and limited medical review scope, leaving out operational, clinical drivers.
-
Regulatory, accreditation, compliance standards often unknown and overlooked.
-
Lack of independent review creates internal biases.
-
Medical review personnel costs are high.
-
Busy work wrangling the details, tracking status, sending/receiving/organizing files.
After Eva Adoption
Eva transforms limited retrospective reviews (<3%) to 100% inspection of all clinical encounters to create a robust Quality Assurance Program that increases insights into care by 4,900%.
Eva eliminates steps and bottlenecks with quick, accurate, and cost-effective all-in-one independent interprofessional expert review workflow solution.
Eva answers common quality of care questions and ties results back to specific performance standards, core measures, clinical guidelines, and more, to make communication easy to understand.
Eva SaaS reviews are up to 14 times faster. Review progress are transparent across an organization. Eva reduces medical review process steps and decreases hours spent on common tasks associated with typical medical review. Targeted reviews focus reviews on the, quality review, mortality review, peer review, etc. Quality expert trained agentic framework ensure the current clinical standards and best practices are always reviewed. Expert reviews result in saving a combined average of 5-10 hours of clinician time on complex case review.
Eva reviews decrease LOS, Readmissions, HACs, HAIs to improve quality.
Eva was designed by top healthcare quality & medical insiders to provide unsurpassed insights into policies, order sets, care delivery, regulatory and quality standards. The review AI review algorithms are based on best practices that led to a ranking of #1 in patient safety among Academic Medical Centers in the nation in 2014.
What Problems are Solved
Healthcare Environmental Problems
-
Quality Improvement a long road to results.
-
Patient complexity increasing.
-
Limited meaningful performance data for clinicians.
-
Reimbursement challenges.
-
Reimbursement tied to quality performance with 6% of Medicare/Medicaid payment at risk.
-
Increasing legal risk.
-
Resources constrained.
Eva Solution
-
Quality Assurance approach integrates quality with clinicians at care level.
-
Reviews manage complexity.
-
Performance data is on clinicians' patients.
-
Eva produces a strong ROI
-
Eva reduces LOS, Readmissions/reencounters, HACs, HAIs while improving quality ranking.
-
Risks and failures escalated and mitigated or eliminated.
-
Eva eliminates resource constraints.
Manual clinical analyst reviews cannot scale to every patient. Near-misses, compliance gaps are found late, if at at, affecting outcomes, star ratings and costs
What makes Eva Medical Reviews the best?
Current Traditional Review
Single Clinical Analyst
-
Analysts lack systems and interprofessional perspective
-
Many analysts not be familiar with operational, administrative, technology care issues
-
Most reviews lack regulatory and accreditation standards knowledge
-
Reviews require additional input for a comprehensive review
-
Often just focused on a single encounter, missing trends
-
Limited by one person's analysis
-
Time consuming, manual process
-
Reviews only completed on a small portion of patients (<3.5%)
-
Process cannot be scaled
-
Clinicians often disconnected from review process
Eva Medical Care Review
Interprofessional Systems Approach
-
Reviews feed into a robust quality assurance program, transforming information into action
-
Reviews take a systems approach crossing specialties/ settings/ systems
-
Reviewers/developers understand healthcare operations, quality, management
-
Eva team and algorithms trained to focus on the review type to achieve the desired outcome
-
Results transform quality management by providing data to clinicians to improve care
-
Identify critical issues improve safety and reduce risk
-
Reviews focus on clinical care
How Eva Medical Reviews align with High Reliability ?


How Eva Pricing Works
Simple, Transparent Pricing
Pay as you Go (PAYG) - No retainers, no hidden fees
-
Pay only for what you need, when you need
-
Costs less than clinical analyst time
Eva's Clinical & Business Case: Complexity, Patient Safety, Risk
For critical tasks and processes in high-stakes fields like healthcare and aerospace, mandated 100% inspection should be the norm. Yet as a health system, we fail those we serve by not doing so, putting patient safety and quality at risk. There is no ambiguity regarding the necessity for comprehensive verification of care for all and the absolute intolerance of error.


Join the Eva Movement
Healthcare's secret weapon against errors and harm.